A supreme case of fanaticism
No sooner had President Bush announced his nomination of Judge John Roberts than the fur started flying.
No sooner had President Bush announced his nomination of Judge John Roberts than the fur started flying.
Since the introduction of the abortion drug, mifepristone (RU-486) five years ago, five women have died from bacterial infections. Or at least that is what has been reported.
Perhaps the kookiest thing I have come across in days is a report concerning “an influential group of bioethicists” gathered together by Johns Hopkins who have approved the use of human brain cells in the developing brain matter of chimps and great apes.
Just got off the phone with an “in the know” Capitol Hill political type, and there is no good news to report.
A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court ruling that Nebraska’s partial birth abortion law is unconstitutional.
Well you can always say you read it here first. A group of “conservatives” is suggesting that perhaps the wisest choice for Supreme Court nominee would be Utah’s Senator Orrin Hatch.
In case you missed it, many alleged conservative groups are moaning about the possibility that President Bush might nominate attorney general Alberto Gonzales to fill the vacancy on the U.S.
With all the commentary, articles, analyses and “big brothers” like Bill O’Reilly lookin’ out for us, it was surely a pleasure to read a down to earth
Quite amazing to read of President Bush’s comment that those who are publicly critizing the possible Supreme Court nominee, Alberto Gonzales, should tone down their rhetoric.
Remember the 1980s hit “Another One Bites the Dust” by Queen? That song is about getting even by killing people.
If there’s anything the pro-abortion crowd is especially adept with, it’s the subtle use of words — shades of meaning, nuanced turns, linguistic sleight-of-hand.
St. Sabina’s Catholic Church in the Archdiocese of Chicago has had, among those who have spoken from the pulpit