in this issue: hot button issues: PRO-LIFE MEMORIAL DAY / VACCINESabortion: LATIN AMERICAabortion and breast cancer: DENIAL / KOMENcatholics and abortion: COMMUNION / DELAWARE / VIRGINIAculture of life: MIRACLE IN… Read More »Communique – Oct. 7, 2005
In a Zenit news report, we read: “Archbishop Levada suggested that the synod, in its small-group discussions, debate the problem of Catholics ‘who do not understand why it might be a sin to support a political candidate who is openly in favor of abortion or other serious acts against life.'”
It was very warm in the early morning hours as I joined several local pro-life activists in front of the Planned Parenthood clinic in Las Vegas
UNICEF is, undoubtedly, the most well known and, probably, the most popular UN agency among Americans. The organization received $282 million from the United States alone in 2002. What is not well known, however, is UNICEF’s evolution from a life affirming, child saving and Nobel peace prize-winning foundation to a contraceptive-distributing, abortion-performing and sterilization-providing partner of some of the world’s most notorious “family planning” organizations.
Eugenics then and now:
Prelude to the holocaust (Part 1)
While it is fashionable to think of eugenics as a remnant of Hitler’s Third Reich, recent news articles on the contemporary practice of negative eugenics directed at the elimination of handicapped pre-born children demonstrate how deeply this anti-life ideology is embedded into the American psyche.
The March of Dimes brings the eugenic spirit home:
Prelude to the Holocaust (Part 2; see Part 1)
In 1978, following the Pro-Life Movement’s decade-long battle with the March of Dimes, the International Foundation for Genetic Research, popularly known as The Michael Fund, was founded as the pro-life alternative to the MOD. Why such a need existed then and continues to exist today is the subject of this concluding segment on eugenics, appropriately titled “Prelude to the New Holocaust.”
Dear editor: The term “pro-life” is being defined in such a way that even those who favor abortion in some cases are viewed as “pro-life.”… Read More »Letters to the Editor: Politicians Claiming to be Pro-Life
Dear editor: The term “death with dignity” sounds so appealing, doesn’t it? Everyone wants to die with dignity. We know that we have dignity as… Read More »Letters to the Editor: Death with Dignity
Dear editor: It is amazing that the majority of Americans still think of Planned Parenthood as an organization that actually serves the health interests of… Read More »Letters to the Editor: Planned Parenthood is not a ‘good guy’
Dear editor: [Insert name of reporter or letter writer] has misinformed your readers concerning the manner in which the so-called emergency contraceptive pill regimen works.… Read More »Letters to the Editor: Morning-After Pill
Dear editor: Your use of the term “fertilized egg” is scientifically inaccurate. The term further creates the impression that this tiny human being is a… Read More »Letters to the Editor: Fertilized Egg
Dear editor: Pro-abortion apologists often claim that women have a right to “reproductive health” care. But very few actually know what they mean by those… Read More »Letters to the Editor: Reproductive Health