Week in Review – Woman Drugged with Abortion Pills by Husband
A Texas man has been charged with drugging his pregnant wife with abortion pills in an attempt to murder the couple’s child. Thankfully, he failed.
Fox News reports that a Houston lawyer, Mason Herring, was indicted on two felony counts, including assault of a pregnant person, under charges handed down earlier this month by a Harris County grand jury.
Herring and his wife had separated in early 2022, but according to Fox News, were going through counseling and working to mend their marriage. In February, the wife told her husband she was expecting a baby. Just a month later, in March, Herring reportedly began harping on his wife about staying hydrated and allegedly gave her a cloudy glass of water thought to contain Misoprostol.
According to Fox, Anthony Osso, the assistant district attorney in the domestic violence division assigned to the case, stated,
“On the morning of March 17, the defendant, Mr. Herring, goes by the house to bring breakfast and asks if he can bring her water in bed. Again, [he] is talking to her about needing to stay hydrated. He says, ‘If you don’t do so, I’m not leaving.’ She thought it was odd. She thought the water was cloudy. She questioned him a little bit, but, nonetheless, did drink the water, and then he leaves and takes that cup.”
After becoming ill, the wife went to the hospital, telling the staff that she suspected her husband had placed a drug in her drink. She suspected it was an abortion drug, according to the affidavit.
The wife keenly set up cameras in her home and refused any water from her husband. Osso reports that later she found a drug containing Misoprostol in their garbage.
Soon after, she caught her husband on camera lacing one of her drinks and contacted the police.
By the grace of God, the article reports the woman gave birth to a healthy baby.
This is the first case of its kind, and with the drastic and unhinged wave of abortion pills hitting the market, ALL feels it is only time before we see another.
Women are not safe with this horrid drug looming around. Women must be keenly aware of who and what they are around, especially in our society that hates babies.
As Osso puts it, “It’s manipulative. . . . It’s pre-meditated. What we are alleging Mr. Herring did, which we believe the evidence supports, is a pretty heinous act. To do that to someone who trusts you, it’s taking advantage of that trust.”
ALL in the News – ALL Spokesman Hugh Brown a Guest on From the Median, Trending with Timmerie, and Featured in The Center Square
Hugh Brown was recently a guest on the show From the Median. Hugh discussed the disturbing NPR broadcast that featured an abortion in real time. Hugh was also a guest on Relevant Radio’s Trending with Timmerie for the show’s Election Night Special.
Joe Biden recently revealed he is pulling away from codifying Roe v. Wade. The Center Square featured this news in a recent article and included a quote from Hugh Brown. The article has been syndicated in outlets across the country.
Susan Ciancio, Celebrate Life Magazine editor, writes a weekly op-ed often featuring current cultural events with a fresh Catholic perspective. This week’s article, titled “Lessons in generosity from St. Elizabeth of Hungary”, was published by Catholic World Report.
The bi-monthly STOPP Report was published last week. The report dives into the inner workings of Planned Parenthood and how STOPP works to shut them down. Last week’s report was published the day after the election. Read the full report here.
Twice a week, Judie’s commentaries are distributed to an expansive media list. The list contains over 100 media outlets, such as Fox News, The Federalist, Breitbart, and The Daily Caller, among others. Judie’s commentaries are each featured on the front page of ALL.org. Each commentary is also featured as a part of Judie’s recurring column on Renew America.
Video of the Week – Truth Matters in an Election Season
Hugh Brown, executive VP of American Life League, joins “Trending with Timmerie” to discuss the lies of politics and the liberal movement. What is the future of preborn-child-killing and what we can do?
Action Item of the Week – Advent Starts Next Week! Be Ready with the NEW Advent Booklet
Walking with the Saints This Advent will take you through Advent with stories of some amazing saints and with teaching from the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Each day, we introduce a concept from the Catechism, provide a short bio on a saint, and include a reflection of how that saint lived his or her life according to Church teaching. We then offer a way for you to use that saint’s example to build a culture of life in your home or community and end with a short prayer.
Pro-Life Social Media – Montana Citizens Reject Confusing ‘Born-Alive’ Amendment
Killing a baby before he or she is born is no different from killing him or her after they are born. So, if it’s legal to kill a six-month-old preborn child, then pro-aborts should be just as content with killing a born baby who is six minutes old. That’s what Montana decided in this past election. It asked citizens if babies born from attempted abortion should be provided proper medical attention. Actor James Woods tweeted his reaction:
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1590730182331346944
Just over half of the voters chose to let the born baby expire. That shouldn’t be surprising because, as we’ve argued before, pro-aborts don’t believe in a “right to abortion.” They believe in a right to a dead baby.
WHAT IS HAPPENING TO HUMANITY?I am heartbroken.
— 🍊Patriot Ellie #pureblood🩸 (@lenlaly1) November 10, 2022
I think when reading the description of the measure it was super confusing. I think this will get corrected quickly.
— TheMEDIAisEVIL (@conservativejj1) November 10, 2022
So how did it read?
Lotta people angry and horrified about Montana voting to let a baby die after birth.
But the devil is in the details and this is how horrific stuff passes sometimes when it shouldn’t.
Read that. That’s how it read on the ballot. How would you vote? pic.twitter.com/dVNady3Cai
— Jesse Kelly (@JesseKellyDC) November 10, 2022
Well, that IS confusing.
I couldn’t understand this at all, until I read one of the arguments they were handing out. It talked about how babies born with fatal conditions wouldn’t be allowed to be held and gently pass in parents arms, but would be ripped away and put on life support. Bill needs rewrote.
— Sharon Romey (@RomeySharon) November 10, 2022
This could be true.
We've lost our way as a society.
— Susan in laguna (@Susaninlaguna) November 10, 2022
This is also true.
I think these measures are purposely worded to confuse voters
— Jeff Smith (@PineyWoodsTexas) November 10, 2022
This is beyond sickening 😡
— Anna Caffe Latte ☕ (@Anna_CaffeLatte) November 10, 2022
“Born-alive” bills have always had an inherent problem. If parents of a sick child are permitted to hold their dying baby without medical intervention, why deny a mother the same privilege if the dead baby she wants survives the abortion?
Therefore, it’s crucial to give back preborn babies their rights as persons. If they babies have equal protection, then no mother has a right to execute her preborn child.
