Waxman’s whoppers
Congressman Henry Waxman would not get my vote for the most pro-life Democrat in Congress. In fact, quite the opposite is true.
Congressman Henry Waxman would not get my vote for the most pro-life Democrat in Congress. In fact, quite the opposite is true.
Just have to say how elated we are here at American Life League that President Bush vetoed the tragic, deadly bill that would have put the government on record agreeing to pay for the intentional killing of our fellow human beings — embryonic children.
There’s a headline in the news today that brings the entire pro-life struggle into total focus. It reads: “Irish IVF Mother Loses Court Case to Implant Frozen Children.”
The success of the Lord of the Rings film trilogy was certainly a sign of encouragement — that an adaptation of the works of Catholic author J.R.R. Tolkien could have such an impact was gratifying,
I just finished reading an article in the July issue of Vogue magazine. The article is about Cecile Richards, current president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. And no, the article is not online.
In a recent column, Father Frank Pavone, director of Priests for Life, told his readers: “If we want to rouse the public to action and change public policy, we must keep the primary focus where we have the psychological and pedagogical advantage – partial-birth abortion – and move from there to the less obvious issues.”
Last Friday, Washington Post columnist Michael Kinsley, who is generally regarded as one of the smartest liberal pundits around, wrote a column promoting human embryonic stem cell research and castigating pro-lifers for the inconsistency of their views.
One of the most interesting messages in a recent Dallas Morning News story came from Dr. Matthew Wilson, associate professor of political science at SMU.
The sad news was reported July 10 that the Michigan Citizens for Life petition drive had fallen short of the 317,000 signatures needed to put a totally pro-life proposed state constitutional amendment on the November ballot.
That’s according to Dr. Patrick Johnston, who practices family medicine in Zanesville, Ohio. Dr. Johnston wrote a column about the political situation regarding the pro-life movement in Ohio and he makes this point
In today’s Washington Post, columnist Michael Kinsley insists that human embryonic stem cell research “is often described as a moral dilemma, but it simply is not.”
in this issue: abortion / south dakota: POLITICAL GOBBLEDYGOOK / WEB EFFORTeuthanasia: CALIFORNIAexcommunication: CARDINAL ALFONSO LOPEZ TRUJILLOpersonhood: RIGHT TO LIFE ACTplanned parenthood: WAL-MARTstem cell research / ethical: BACK SURGERY / BOGO… Read More »Communique – Jul. 7, 2006