Truth Makes the Enemy Cower
This is the season for Christian love and goodwill. Yet the air is polluted with the bombast of pro-aborts who never seem to stop spewing.
This is the season for Christian love and goodwill. Yet the air is polluted with the bombast of pro-aborts who never seem to stop spewing.
Isn’t it bad enough when shots are fired at pro-life activities from the Department of Killing (DK)—my label for the culture of death?
Mississippi’s recent personhood amendment, which was poised to be the first in the nation to pass, failed. Why? In part, because many pro-life advocates were… Read More »Planned Parenthood prominent in defeat of Mississippi personhood amendment; celebrating now
In the wake of the recent Mississippi personhood vote, commentators on both sides of the question appear to be unified in a peculiar way.
The results of the election in Mississippi are now clear. We are saddened that the good citizens of this fine state have rejected efforts to grant basic human rights to preborn human beings.
Over the past couple of years a great many shocking facts have emerged about the inherent dangers associated with “reproductive technology,” including and most specifically in vitro fertilization.
The fascinating thing about anonymous blog posts is that they frequently provide profound insight while protecting the anonymity of the writer.
The definitions of the terms used in a discussion can and do change the outcome. The political maxim, “He who frames the issue wins the debate” applies in many situations including how the public views what abortion is and why it is either legitimate or illicit.
Pro-life deserves to know that formal legal definitions, such as those proposed here, are usually legally required to be interpreted by the courts as “exclusionary”—that is, only precisely what is included in the definition is covered by the law; anything not precisely included in that definition is not covered by the law.
The headline, “Outcry in America as Pregnant Women Who Lose Babies Face Murder Charges,” speaks volumes about the lengths that some will pursue to express misplaced outrage for the sole purpose of defending the reproductive rights of women.
Sometimes a writer will say things that are so outlandish that even my grandmother, God rest her soul, would have been angry.
When I first read Toni Panetta’s rant against elected officials’ “myopic zeal to eliminate women’s ability to access abortion” I was struck with her talent for using words in a way that deconstructs actual facts about the human body and the ability of a woman to become pregnant and carry a child.