Pope Benedict XVI has addressed the problematic nature of moral relativism (MoRe) on several occasions, including the effect that such thinking, which he calls a “dictatorship of relativism,” has had on young people across the world.
In our struggle to remind our fellow citizens that pregnancy involves two people, we often confront the challenge of saying things in new or better ways in order to catch the fleeting attention of others.
First, let me thank Senator Sears and members of the Judiciary Committee for allowing us to be here this morning to provide our views on S.103.
We are now nearly halfway through the Fortnight for Freedom and the Catholic bishops are finally getting priests and laypeople alike to focus attention to the threat being foisted upon us by the Obama administration’s mandate.
Anticipation is building to a fever pitch in and around the nation’s capital as various types of leaders jockey for position and posture while waiting for that big moment when the Supreme Court reaches a decision on Obamacare.
What the South most needs is peace, and peace depends upon the supremacy of law.
Ever since Pope Paul VI issued his encyclical, Humanae Vitae, Catholic dissidents have tried their hardest to misrepresent the teaching.
Here’s an interesting case study in news coverage of scientific issues: The New York Times has given prominent attention to a report that “emergency contraceptive” pills may not be abortifacient.
A recent headline proclaiming the great advances science has made in detecting defects in preborn children sent a chill down my pro-life spine.
The first time I ever heard the name Abby Johnson I was fascinated by the information I received about her.
With the United States and the world facing the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression, everyone is asking: “How did we get here? And when will we get out of it?”
President Obama’s positions on “social issues” have never been known as consistent or logical.