While it is certainly right to lament the fact the Obama administration is attempting to force Catholic institutions, through the Health and Human Services mandate, to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives, abortifacients, and sterilization, there is a bright side to all this.
Here’s an interesting case study in news coverage of scientific issues: The New York Times has given prominent attention to a report that “emergency contraceptive” pills may not be abortifacient.
Sometimes an event will literally rock the earth beneath me. One such incident came to my attention recently by way of Jill Stanek—the pro-life movement’s number one commentator.
We publicly stated our relief that the federal government exhibited a smidge of common sense when it determined that morning after pills should not be available over the counter like they’re sticks of bubble gum.
One study that Plan B manufacturer Teva Pharmaceuticals cited as justification for eliminating existing age
The FDA is once again contemplating putting so-called emergency contraception (EC) on pharmacy shelves.
An error occurred at a Safeway pharmacy in which methotrexate, a drug used for chemotherapy, treatment of severe inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, and abortions, was dispensed to a pregnant woman.
The disinformation campaign about the actions of various birth control pills and how they work began years ago. American Life League has testified against them on many occasions
Not only could EC kill a tiny preborn life in its earliest stages, but the morning-after pill is also very dangerous to a woman’s health.…
The emergency contraceptive/morning-after pill has three modes of action (as does the regular birth control pill); that is, it can work in one of three…
A recent article by Detroit Free Press reporter Megha Satyanarayana aroused in me a fundamental disdain for dishonesty that I find very hard to ignore.